Republicans, including McConnell, claimed their opposition to the bill has been rooted in how spending would be approved. But a technical error required another vote, and this time, more than two dozen Republicans switched sides. After Republicans initially blocked a bill that would expand benefits for veterans exposed to toxins while deployed, the Senate is now poised to pass the legislation in the coming days. We CANNOT trust the same extreme MAGA Republicans who voted against PACT ACT vets cancer care to fund it - they wont! Stewart also warned of rumored amendments from people like Illinois Republican paper-punchingbezerker man Rep. Mike Bost, who might try to plead poverty in order to put a Band-Aid where real comprehensive treatment was needed. Shelby tweeted Tuesday night that he remained a strong advocate for our veterans but could not support the $400 billion mandatory spending provision. Opposition from 25 Republican senators who changed their vote, citing concerns over how the measure was funded, stymied the bill last Wednesday. "This is a sad day in the U.S. Senate," Chairman of the Senate's Veterans' Affairs (VA) Committee and Montana's Democratic Senator Jon Tester said after the vote. WATCH: Senate passes PACT Act, expanding health The Democratic candidate for an open Senate seat in Missouri, Lucas Kunce, echoed the sentiment in an interview with Vox. How does this happen? WASHINGTON - Eleven Republicans voted Tuesday against a bill that funds research and benefits for as much as 3.5 million veterans who were impacted by toxic substances while they served. The measure, known as the PACT Act or the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxic bill, passed with an 86-11 vote. Veterans, military family members and advocates rally outside the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Aug. 2, 2022, in support of a bill that enhances health care and disability benefits for millions of veterans exposed to the toxic burn pits. Who's running for president in 2024? WebRT @RedTRaccoon: 217 Republicans just voted to cut the budget of Veterans Affairs. There is a mechanism created in this bill, its a budgetary gimmick, that has the intent of making it possible to have a huge explosion in unrelated spending $400 billion, Toomey claimed on the Senate floor Wednesday. The bill will fund research and benefits for as many as 3.5 million veterans who were exposed to toxic substances during service. RELEASE: Gottheimer Demands Senate Immediately Vote Against WebRepublicans voted against the Pact Act because it would enable $400 billion over the next 10 years in spending completely unrelated to veterans. The fight to make it harder for landlords to evict their tenants, On Succession, Sisyphus rolls the rock uphill. Sen. Pat Toomey holds up final approval of burn pit Please also read our Privacy Notice and Terms of Use, which became effective December 20, 2019. The bill could be called for another vote by its supporters. It was difficult and painful to breathe. Update, August 2, 12:30 pm: This story has been updated to include new information about a Senate vote on this legislation. This gimmick allows $400B in spending completely unrelated to veterans care. McConnell vowed not to allow a bipartisan technology bill championed by Schumer, the CHIPS Act, to clear the Senate so long as the proposal that became the Inflation Reduction Act was on the table. Both chambers of Congress previously approved the bill, with the Senate voting 84-14 in June in favor, but the bill was forced into another vote after administrative issues were found in its text. Eleven Republican senators voted Tuesday against a bipartisan measure, the PACT Act, that is designed to help veterans who were exposed to toxic chemicals while deployed abroad. Of the 42 senators who voted against the Pact ACT, 41 were Republicans. If you do not want us and our partners to use cookies and personal data for these additional purposes, click 'Reject all'. The measure was sent to the White House after Republicans had blocked the legislation last week, objecting to the inclusion of $400 billion in mandatory spending that would not be subject to annual appropriations review unlike the usual discretionary spending for federal agencies and programs that Congress reviews and approves annually. Please enter a valid email and try again. Other Republican senators say they were convinced by this argument, and now, Schumer has said he will allow a vote on an appropriations amendment as the bill comes up for consideration again this week. But supporters of the bill noted that Republicans had previously supported the measures mandatory spending. May 1 (UPI) -- El Paso, Texas, will enter a state of emergency starting Monday, in advance of the pandemic-era immigration policy Title 42 being lifted, the border city's mayor, Oscar Leeser, declared. When we decide we need to engage and initiate in a military action, we should understand that the cost is not just in our defense budget, but also in our veterans budget when they come home. In fact, Pelosi went on, the cost of this bill is a fraction if we're talking budget of the cost of the Republican tax bill that they passed in 2017, which added $2 trillion to the national debt. Veterans groups, family members, longtime advocate Jon Stewart and several Democratic lawmakers gathered outside the U.S. Capitol after the vote on Thursday to voice their outrage.

Lindsey Knickerbocker 2021, What Are Socrates Rules For Poetry, Diageo Management Structure, Articles W